1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The good news about nuclear destruction

Discussion in 'The Main Board' started by Atlas, Jul 20, 2016.

  1. Atlas

    Atlas Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2016
    Messages:
    1,269
    Likes Received:
    233
    • [​IMG]
    • [​IMG]
    The Good News About Nuclear Destruction
    The Good News About Nuclear Destruction

    By Shane Connor for Physicians for Civil Defense


    What possible 'good news' could there ever be about nuclear destruction coming to America, whether it is Dirty Bombs, Terrorist Nukes, or ICBM's from afar?

    In a word, they are all survivable for the vast majority of American families, IF they know what to do beforehand and have made even the most modest of preparations.

    Tragically, though, most Americans today won't give much credence to this good news, much less seek out such vital life-saving instruction, as they have been jaded by our culture's pervasive myths of nuclear un-survivability.

    Most people think that if nukes go off then everybody is going to die, or it'll be so bad they'll wish they had. That's why you hear such absurd comments as; "If it happens, I hope I'm at ground zero and go quickly."

    This defeatist attitude was born as the disarmament movement ridiculed any competing alternatives to their ban-the-bomb agenda, like Civil Defense. The activists wanted all to think there was no surviving any nukes, disarmament was your only hope. The sound Civil Defense strategies of the 50's, 60's and 70's have been derided as being largely ineffective, or at worst a cruel joke. Since the supposed end of the Cold War in the 80's, most Americans saw neither a need to prepare, nor believed that preparation would do any good. Today, with growing prospects of nuclear terrorism, and nuclear saber rattling from rogue nations, we see emerging among the public either paralyzing fear or irrational denial. People can't even begin to envision effective preparations for ever surviving a nuclear attack. They think it totally futile, bordering on lunacy, to even try.

    Ironically, the disarmament activists legacy, regardless their noble intent, has rendered millions of Americans even more vulnerable to perishing from nukes in the future.

    The biggest surprise for most Americans, from the first flash of a nuke being unleashed, is that they will still be here, though ill-equipped to survive for long, if they don't know what to do beforehand from that very first second of the initial flash onward.

    For instance, many could readily survive the delayed blast wave via the old 'Duck & Cover' tactic, and that is very good news, IF they knew to do it quick as the flash appeared. Unfortunately, most don't, and even fewer know how to later survive the coming radioactive fallout which could eventually kill many times more than the blast. However, there is still more good news possible, as well over 90% of those potential casualties from fallout are avoidable, too, IF the public was pre-trained through an aggressive national Civil Defense educational program. Simple measures taken immediately after a nuclear detonation, by a pre-trained public, can prevent agonizing death and injury from radiation exposure.

    The National Planning Scenario #1, an originally confidential internal 2004 study by the Department of Homeland Security, examined the effects of a terrorist nuke detonated in Washington, D.C.. They discovered that a 10 kiloton nuke, about 2/3rds the size of the Hiroshima bomb, detonated at ground level, would result in about 15,000 immediate deaths, and another 15,000 casualties from the blast, thermal flash and initial radiation release.1 As horrific as that is, and even without 'Duck & Cover', the surprising revelation here is that over 99% of the residents in the DC area will have just witnessed and survived their first nuclear explosion. Clearly, the good news is most people would survive that initial blast.

    However, that study also soberly determined that as many as another 250,000 people could soon be at risk from lethal doses of radiation from the fallout drifting downwind towards them after the blast. (Another study, released in August 2006 by the Rand Corporation, looked at a terrorist 10 kiloton nuke arriving in a cargo container and being exploded in the Port of Long Beach, California. Over 150,000 people were estimated to be at risk downwind from fallout, again many more than from the initial blast itself.2)

    The good news here, that these much larger casualty numbers from radioactive fallout are largely avoidable, too, only applies to those pre-trained beforehand by a Civil Defense program in what they need to do before it arrives.

    Today, lacking any meaningful Civil Defense program, millions of American families continue to be at risk and could perish needlessly for lack of essential knowledge that used to be taught at the grade school level.

    The public at large, businesses and all our children's schools, urgently need to be instructed in Civil Defense basics again. Like how most can save themselves by immediately employing the 'Duck & Cover' tactic, rather than just allowing an impulsive rush to the nearest windows to see what that 'bright flash' was across town, just-in-time to be shredded by the glass imploding inward from that delayed shock wave blast.

    Most also don't know, even when caught in the open, just lying flat, reduces by eight-fold the chances of being hit by debris from that brief, three second, tornado strength shock wave blast that, like lightning & thunder, could be delayed arriving anywhere from a couple seconds to 2 minutes after that initial flash.
     
    Overlander likes this.
  2. Atlas

    Atlas Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2016
    Messages:
    1,269
    Likes Received:
    233
    There is much more at the link. Shane is a good guy, and super knowledgeable. If you haven't read his site lately it's a good time to catch up or get acquainted with it.
     
  3. Jerry D Young

    Jerry D Young Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2016
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    35
    I agree. Civil Defense up until it was replace, was an effective plan at the time. There is so much more and better information available now, along with items that can help people survive not only a nuclear event, but many other types of events, too. I really hope that we will get a Civil Defense program going again as part of DHS, as much as I hate them.

    Just my opinion.
     
    Atlas likes this.
  4. Atlas

    Atlas Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2016
    Messages:
    1,269
    Likes Received:
    233
    It seems unlikely Jerry. But, the info and the tools are out there, we just have to seek them out. Ultimately it's our responsibility to look after ourselves, so I feel better about doing it myself.
     
  5. Atlas

    Atlas Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2016
    Messages:
    1,269
    Likes Received:
    233
    A couple of good videos.



     
    Overlander and Jerry D Young like this.
  6. Atlas

    Atlas Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2016
    Messages:
    1,269
    Likes Received:
    233


    A good video showing nuclear explosions around the world on a timeline.
     
    Jerry D Young likes this.

Share This Page